Templates

Removing the adoption barrier

Templates

Removing the adoption barrier

Templates

Removing the adoption barrier

Case studies

Templates

Overview

Overview

Overview

As it's a very dense and complex feature, we face some struggles with adoption. Some users find it complicated and difficult to use.

In order to make this feature more friendly and remove barriers to entry for less tech-savvy users, templates were first introduced in 2018. This was proven to be a major adoption driver, resulting in 44% of automations created from templates.

The first iteration of templates worked well enough, but as Pipedrive grew in functionality and more integrations were introduced, we needed to revamp the templates in order to integrate them with our updated codebase, make them scalable and future proof.

My contribution

My contribution

Product strategy


User Research


User Interface


Product Management

The team

The team

1 Product manager


1 Front end engineer


1 Back end engineer


1 UX Writer

Year

Year

2023

2023

Context

Even though there were some technical requirements that helped this project to gain priority in our roadmap, the main problem was quite simple:

Users think automations are too complicated and don't know how to start automating their sales processes.

Context

Even though there were some technical requirements that helped this project to gain priority in our roadmap, the main problem was quite simple:

Users think automations are too complicated and don't know how to start automating their sales processes.

Context

Even though there were some technical requirements that helped this project to gain priority in our roadmap, the main problem was quite simple:

Users think automations are too complicated and don't know how to start automating their sales processes.

Discovery

The user feedback pointed to a clear pain point, but I needed to analyse and evaluate the main problems with the first iteration of templates, so the next iteration would not repeat some mistakes that might have been done in the past.

The first thing I did was collect data to understand which parts of the template setup needed the most attention, and this is what I discovered:

The main problem in the activation funnel was that only 8% of the users that visited automations started setting up a workflow from templates, while 58% of those users who clicked on a template finished setting it up. This demonstrated that there was an issue in discoverability and users were potentially not aware of how the templates could help them get started.

Discovery

The user feedback pointed to a clear pain point, but I needed to analyse and evaluate the main problems with the first iteration of templates, so the next iteration would not repeat some mistakes that might have been done in the past.

The first thing I did was collect data to understand which parts of the template setup needed the most attention, and this is what I discovered:

The main problem in the activation funnel was that only 8% of the users that visited automations started setting up a workflow from templates, while 58% of those users who clicked on a template finished setting it up. This demonstrated that there was an issue in discoverability and users were potentially not aware of how the templates could help them get started.

Discovery

The user feedback pointed to a clear pain point, but I needed to analyse and evaluate the main problems with the first iteration of templates, so the next iteration would not repeat some mistakes that might have been done in the past.

The first thing I did was collect data to understand which parts of the template setup needed the most attention, and this is what I discovered:

The main problem in the activation funnel was that only 8% of the users that visited automations started setting up a workflow from templates, while 58% of those users who clicked on a template finished setting it up. This demonstrated that there was an issue in discoverability and users were potentially not aware of how the templates could help them get started.

Hypotheses

After diagnosing the main navigation issues, I had a few ideas on why the discoverability of the templates was so low.

Cognitive overload

Too many similar templates, which could make it harder for users to find the right template

Mental model

Titles and descriptions relied heavily on technicalities, which could cause confusion in users who aren't yet familiarized with the feature.

Illustrations

Illustrations were very redundant and repetitive.

One big win

What was spot on, was that the wizard inputs were in natural language, this helped abstract some of the complexity from the workflows and allowed users to grasp what that automation would accomplish.

Hypotheses

After diagnosing the main navigation issues, I had a few ideas on why the discoverability of the templates was so low.

Cognitive overload

Too many similar templates, which could make it harder for users to find the right template

Mental model

Titles and descriptions relied heavily on technicalities, which could cause confusion in users who aren't yet familiarized with the feature.

Illustrations

Illustrations were very redundant and repetitive.

One big win

What was spot on, was that the wizard inputs were in natural language, this helped abstract some of the complexity from the workflows and allowed users to grasp what that automation would accomplish.

Hypotheses

After diagnosing the main navigation issues, I had a few ideas on why the discoverability of the templates was so low.

Cognitive overload

Too many similar templates, which could make it harder for users to find the right template

Mental model

Titles and descriptions relied heavily on technicalities, which could cause confusion in users who aren't yet familiarized with the feature.

Illustrations

Illustrations were very redundant and repetitive.

One big win

What was spot on, was that the wizard inputs were in natural language, this helped abstract some of the complexity from the workflows and allowed users to grasp what that automation would accomplish.

Validation

In effort to understand the current UX and take those learnings into consideration when thinking of the design, I conducted some testing sessions and prompted users with a scenario, they were asked to choose between two templates that were essentially the same, but with different illustrations and titles, to see if they would prefer options that described use cases or detailed steps of the workflow.

Variation A

Variation B

Most of the users were drawn to templates that communicated the use case instead of detailed steps, and the illustrations had no impact in the choice they made.

After discovering that the messaging on the templates should be less descriptive, I gave users a list of templates and asked them to sort it in a way that made sense for them. People would either divide them by action performed or by use case.

Validation

In effort to understand the current UX and take those learnings into consideration when thinking of the design, I conducted some testing sessions and prompted users with a scenario, they were asked to choose between two templates that were essentially the same, but with different illustrations and titles, to see if they would prefer options that described use cases or detailed steps of the workflow.

Variation A

Variation B

Most of the users were drawn to templates that communicated the use case instead of detailed steps, and the illustrations had no impact in the choice they made.

After discovering that the messaging on the templates should be less descriptive, I gave users a list of templates and asked them to sort it in a way that made sense for them. People would either divide them by action performed or by use case.

Validation

In effort to understand the current UX and take those learnings into consideration when thinking of the design, I conducted some testing sessions and prompted users with a scenario, they were asked to choose between two templates that were essentially the same, but with different illustrations and titles, to see if they would prefer options that described use cases or detailed steps of the workflow.

Variation A

Variation B

Most of the users were drawn to templates that communicated the use case instead of detailed steps, and the illustrations had no impact in the choice they made.

After discovering that the messaging on the templates should be less descriptive, I gave users a list of templates and asked them to sort it in a way that made sense for them. People would either divide them by action performed or by use case.

Solution

Solution

Solution

Results

285%

increase on template card clicks

1.5x

bump on automations created from templates

Results

285%

increase on template card clicks

1.5x

bump on automations created from templates

Results

285%

increase on template card clicks

1.5x

bump on automations created from templates

Learnings

  • There is always a way of validating assumptions, especially when they are hard to back with data.


  • As this project involved a lot of copy, I had to design things not only thinking of visual aspects, but also how the copy would translate into 22 different languages, and how the design, labels and inputs, would be scalable for localisation purposes.

Learnings

  • There is always a way of validating assumptions, especially when they are hard to back with data.


  • As this project involved a lot of copy, I had to design things not only thinking of visual aspects, but also how the copy would translate into 22 different languages, and how the design, labels and inputs, would be scalable for localisation purposes.

Learnings

  • There is always a way of validating assumptions, especially when they are hard to back with data.


  • As this project involved a lot of copy, I had to design things not only thinking of visual aspects, but also how the copy would translate into 22 different languages, and how the design, labels and inputs, would be scalable for localisation purposes.